Kategoriarkiv: Elektronisk forskningspublisering

Review of Kitchens: «Student Inquiry in New Media»

Kitchens, Marshall W. Student Inquiry in New Media: Critical Media Literacy and Video Games. Kairos 10.2. (2006) <http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/10.2/binder2.html?coverweb/kitchens/index.html> 17 January, 2014.

I am studying a random selection of research papers. Sometimes, that gives results I did not wished for.

In an issue with seven multimodal, experimental hypertexts, my dice chose this traditional linear essay, printed on the web. It has four sections: Introduction, Methodology, Student Projects, and Conclusion, plus an abstract and a list of references. Links to all six parts are fould at the bottom of every page, togehter with a photograph of two hands holding a PlayStation controller. Each page ends with a «next» link, clearly indication the preferrerd reading order.

Kitchens describes how he gave his writing class the task of replicating a study of gender imbalance in computer games. Using three sample student projects as examples, he contends that this is an effectful pedagogy for teaching academic writing.

I found the paper both interesting and well written, and I am happy to have read it. It just didn’t add much to my understanding of avant-garde research publishing on the net.

Review of Hypermedia Berlin

Todd Presner. «Hypermedia Berlin: Cultural History in the Age of New Media, or ‘Is There a Text in This Class?’«. Vectors 1.2 (2006) < http://vectors.usc.edu/projects/index.php?project=60>. Visited 7 January 2014.

This work is a 15-minute Flash demo of the interactive map Hypermedia Berlin, which brings together 25 maps of Berlin dating from 1237 to 2003. Hotspots in the map link to short texts and photographs of prominent places and people in the city’s history.

In the film presentation, the cursor of a user clicks controls on the interactive map and changes what is displayed, while text boxes appear on top explaining what is happening. It is rather slow paced, but effective still, as the reader/viewer can study the part of the map shown for a little while before the explanatory text appears. The same effect could have been achieved with a voice-over narration, but a long essay with inset illustrations would have been much less effective.

Review of «Critical remediation»

Berry, Patrick. «Critical remediation: Locating Eliza«. Kairos 11.3 (2008). < http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/11.3/binder.html?topoi/prior-et-al/about/abstract_berry.html> visited 3 January 2013.

This short text is part of a larger collection, a «web text» on «Remediating the canons» in Kairos 11.3.

Berry’s contribution uses an 800×600-pixel canvas, where a scroll of text fills the larger middle pane. To the left is an image and a table of contents, and at the bottom is a row of four images, some still and some moving.
The essay is found in the text scroll, divided into five parts, each on a separate page. The images around the edges are «remediations» of  George Bernard Shaw’s play Pygmalion. Some are manipulated images of theatrical posters and film footage. Others contain sound clips related to the theme pygmalion theme. There are also two short video clips of other scholars discussing this overall theme of literacy as upward social movement.

Skjermbilde 2014-01-03 kl. 10.40.19

Berry uses imagery and sound as commentary and expansions to his central theme of the proilferation of the Pygmalion theme, and the many examples do enforce his message. The essay is linear, and there are no use of hyperlinks apart from the table of contents.

Review of Paleoclimatology of the future

Stephenson, M.H., et.al. Abrupt environmental and climatic change during the deposition of the early permian haushi limestone, Oman (Article of the Future, <http://www.articleofthefuture.com/S0031018208004690/>, first published in Paleography, Paleoclimatology, Palaeoecology 270.1, 1-18)

Like other «Articles of the future», this article begins with both research highlights in the form of bullet points and an abstract. In this case the abstract is more detailed than the research highlights, and both include hyperlinks that can make a timeline or the Gharif formation of Oman’s record in the Paleobiology database appear in the right sidebar. The research highlights also include an animated figure, the print from some kind of analysis I am not familiar with.

After a short introduction follows a longer section on Geological Setting. This sums up much prior work on paleogeography in the area, and features a large map of continental plates, as well as a map of where core drillings were made and two stratigraphies. The map can be swapped with an «interactive» Google map of the places.

The disciplines I am most familiar with emphasize the discussion of research methods, and it was new to me to see an article that just states that «the methods used […] are given by» three earlier articles cited. This is just an overview, however, and more details on method is given in the following four subsections, where the methods and results from different disciplines are exposed in detail. Closer and closer photographs and interpretations makes up the sequence in this section. From quantitative analysis of whole samples to cross sections, further to single pollen particles, and, finally, electromicroscopy of isotopes.

Different kinds of species found in the core samples are listed in section 3.3 on Palynology. Each taxa is hyperlinked to a lookup in the Paleobiology database and the brachiopod photo collection, which appears in the right sidebar. This is rather impressive to me, as it provides lots of extra information. I can’t say whether it would impress a palynologist, though.

Section 4 is the discussion, which interprets the details from section 3 to paint a large picture of how the geology and climate developed in the area studied.

This article bases very much of its arguent on visuals, it contains fifteen figures and plates, and the references «see figure n» appears frequently. Several «plates» of photographs from the microscopy are given as examples, while figures show the relation between the samples studied. Just clicking on the reference and having the right illustration appear in the right sidebar independent of the text is very convenient. This convenience is diminished, however, in plate I, where eight figures are labeled a-h, and I have to read the long caption to understand which represent clusters 1-7 mentioned in the text.

All the images are also in the print version of the article, so the only visual advantage of the Article of the future is the ability to view them independent of the running text. The print publication, on the other hand, presents the images much larger and more detailed, so anyone really interested in this research would like to have a large computer monitor and download full-resolution imagery to get the same information on the web.

The text is also strewn with hyperlinks to the table of geologcial periods. I suspect these are put in automatically, and I would guess researchers within this disciplines know these periods by heart, so it seems less interesting.

Review of «This is Scholarship»

Braun, Catherine C., & Gilbert, Kenneth L. (2008). This Is Scholarship. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 12(3). Retrieved January 2, 2014, from
http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/12.3/topoi/braun_gilbert/index.html

A page of writing serves as an introduction to a 3’14» long video. Following a statement from the Modern Language Association, the authors are concerned that shcolars working in new media aren’t given credit for their work in tenure committees. The video, held in a style influenced by Welch’s The Machine is Us/ing Us , shows many examples of digital shcolarly work, intertwined with simple text posters arguing that digital scholarly work exists and has value.
There are also links to a list of further reading, and references to the works showed in the short film.

Review of Delagrange: «When Revision is Redesign»

Delagrange, S. H. (2009). When Revision Is Redesign: Key Questions for Digital Scholarship. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 14(1). Retrieved January 2, 2014, from
http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/14.1/inventio/delagrange/index.html

«When revision is Redesign» is an afterthought of a larger work, reporting on the design of an earlier multimedia work published in Kairos. It consists of nine pages plus references, each page beginning with a question that is answered in the following text.

Persistent navigation links to the nine pages are always available in the left column, forming a very common type of web design. The list invites me to read in a sequence from top to bottom, but the text is written so it can be read in many sequences, in fact. It is natural to begin with the «Introuction» and end with «Reflection», but the other pages can be read in any sequence. I will call this form pseudo-linear.

Rather than looking like a research article, this article remediates magazine layout. Here are colors and mixed fonts, and each page has a pull quote set a bit down the page. Screenshots of early versions as well as a few phototgraphs are used as illustrations.

«When Revision is Redesign» is not remarkable as a multimedia work, nor as a scholarly article. It is a short, decent design report set in pretty standard web design.

Information science article of the future

«Supervised ranking in the weka environment» by Stijn Lievens and Bernard De Baets is an adaptation of a paper printed in Information Sciences 129.6 into an «article of the future».

Elsevier experiments with different kinds of abstracts. This article has a «research highlights» section with four bullet points first, before a very short abstract.

The structure is very clear, with four parts: Problem description, Methods, Implementation of the Propositionsl, and Use of the Software. Only after the problem description, which is quite long, is the outline of the paper described.

In the right column (the «sidebar», one can view article information, knowledge tree (a conception I don’t understand the point with), author information, figures, tables, data repositories, data set, formulas, propositions, software enviroment, and references.

The left column contains an article overview with thumbnails of three figures and a table.
In section three, an algorithm is described. I find it interesting that the algorithm is discussed and explained before it is presented. A lot of information can be called up in the right column to be referenced next to the running text, such as figures, tables, formulas, and propositions. It would seem logical to be able to view the algorithm in there too, next to the description of it in section 3.1.

The style changes notably in section 4. Math and formulas are no more, instead there is a plain-language description of the software package made by the methods outlined earlier.

Analysis of a math article of the future

I have tried to read the «Article of the Future» version of Alain Connes, Caterina Consani and Matilde Marcoli’s «Fun with F1,» an adaptation of an article in Journal of Number Theory (180.24). I hardly understood a word, as it requires a lot of schooling in mathematics. I can comment somewhat on the hypertext aspcets, however. Les videre